Ambers Lawyer SEALED Jury Information To ATTACK Johnny With The Juror Imposter

Author:

Video Creator’s Channel Just In

author link

It Has Been A Rough Couple Of Days For

Amber heard after her lawyers were accused of stealing jury information so what exactly is going on and what are the fans saying Fans have called out Amber and her team for trying to ambush depp with their new motion concerning a jury imposter the age discrepancy was clear according to the motion, so why not raise it immediately. The motion concedes the state at birth year 1945 was shown to the parties during jury selection. The motion is silent weather heard objected one person commented while another replied because they held it back on purpose in order to do this. Ah claims juror 15 got a summons meant for someone else and reported for duty. When many people look for reasons to avoid jury service.

None Of Those Who Received A

summons would know they might be picked for the deaf herd trial. Her theory makes no sense. Another fan wrote Wouldn’t every jury member show an id before sitting in court. Maybe it was a typo. I cannot imagine that they would miss that this seems to be a desperate attempt.

Another Fan Added While A Fifth

one wrote she wants a second take so badly lol thing is I don’t think it’s even occurred to her that a second trial might end up worse for her. A new jury might not even throw her the bone. This one did another fan simply added is she ever going to accept she lost gather any tiny bit of dignity. She has left and get on with her life. I mean I’m thinking no but it would be nice to be wrong on that one ouch.

Amber Has Been Facing The Wrath Of Depp

bands since Friday July 1st when heard’s Attorneys formally requested the jury’s verdict either be set aside the complaint dismissed or a new trial be ordered. The 43-page court filing detailed a multitude of reasons why heard’s lawyers believed it necessary to throw out the ruling from claiming the jury’s findings were unsupported by the evidence to arguing one of the jurors may not have been appropriately vetted. The court documents called for the court to investigate a person known as Juror 15. Alleging. There was a discrepancy with the juror’s birth year leading them to believe their identity was not properly verified before serving in the high profile trial on the juror panelist sent to council before Voir dire.

The Court Noted That The Individual Who

would later be designated juror 15 had a birth year of 1945 The memorandum read. 15 however, was clearly born later than 1945. the filing explained that though using public information, they were able to discover the juror was likely born in 1970, meaning it’s possible Juror 15 may not have actually received the summons for jury duty. The court’s clerk office had a statutory obligation to verify the identity of juror 15. but because Juror 15 was not born in 1945.

It Appears His Identity Could Not Have

been verified through any of the means of identification. The code provides the court papers continued referring to Virginia Code 8. 01-353. 1. It also raises questions about whether and how juror 15 could have signed a statement affirming under penalty of perjury that he was named Juror.

If He Was 15 Years Younger

than the person. The court recognized as Juror 15. . The documents further concluded that if the juror’s identity was not appropriately confirmed herds due. was compromised judge Penny Asgrit has indicated that she is not inclined to schedule more hearings in the case.

  • jury
  • juror
  • jurors
  • accused
  • amber

  • ruling claiming jury findings
  • juror 15 got summons meant
  • accused stealing jury information exactly
  • jury imposter age
  • new motion concerning jury

In The Last Legal Encounter.

On June 24th, Azgrid put the final judgment in the court record after Brendhoff argued for further hearings ascribe bluntly told heard’s attorney that if she wanted to appeal the verdict from the seven-person jury she would have to file motions with the court. Azkrit also informed Brettahopt that the Aquaman Star will have to put up 8. 35 million bond with an annual six percent interest before any appeal would move forward. Representatives for heard have said she does not have the money to pay debt or meet the bond with the 10 million dollar judgment against herd and a 2 million judgment against depp on a single count of defamation now registered with the court.

There Appears Little Opportunity Left For

the parties to reach. out-of-court settlement after the verdict Depp’s lawyers hinted that the Pirates star might be willing to forego a share of the award, but heard has since repeated many of her claims against him, including during an interview on NBc suggesting that the matter at least for heard is far from resolved. Depp filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife over a 2018 op-ed. She wrote for the Washington post in which she called herself a victim of domestic and sexual violence. Although the jury ruled the pirates of the Caribbean actor had also defamed heard and found he owed damages equals to 2 million.

They Largely Sided With Death And Hurd

was ordered to pay him a total of 8.35 million in damages. Now we would love to hear from you do you think amber’s attempt to have the defamation ruling thrown out will succeed let us know in the comments. Always thanks for watching!

Summary

Fans have called out Amber and her team for trying to ambush depp with their new motion concerning a jury imposter the age discrepancy was clear according to the motion . Amber has been facing the wrath of Depp bands since Friday July 1st when heard’s Attorneys formally requested the jury’s verdict either be set aside the complaint dismissed or a new trial be ordered . The 43-page court filing detailed a multitude of reasons why heard’s lawyers believed it necessary to throw out the ruling from claiming the . jury’s findings were unsupported by the evidence to arguing one of the jurors may not have been appropriately vetted . A new jury might not even throw her the bone, one fan simply added is she ever going to accept she lost any tiny bit of dignity.& She has left and get on with her life.& I mean I’m thinking no but it would be nice to be wrong on that one ouch. The court documents called for a new verdict.& The motion is silent weather heard…. Click here to read more and watch the full video