FAKE OUTRAGE The Left Rewrites Language to Try to Cancel ACB PseudoIntellectual

Author:

Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV

author link

The Second Interaction That I Wanted To Highlight For

you all started off with this question from Senator Dianne Feinstein. You identify yourself with the justice that you like him would be a consistent vote to roll back hard-fought freedoms and protections for the LGBt community and what I was hoping you would say is that this would be a point of difference where those freedoms would be respected and you haven’t said that Senator I have no agenda and I do want to be clear that I have never discriminated on the basis of sexual preference and would not ever discriminate on the basis of sexual preference. You know like racism. I think discrimination is abhorrent on the questions of law. However, I just because I’m a sitting judge and because you can’t answer questions without going through the judicial process can’t give answers to those very specific questions.

Big Topic Of Discussion For Democrats Were

LGBt rights, specifically whether Judge Barrett, if elected to the Supreme Court would attempt to overturn the ruling on gay marriage and Democrats are especially worried about this since Judge Barrett, considered former Supreme Court Justice Scalia, somewhat of a mentor and justice Scalia was very vocal about his dissent for that gay marriage ruling. I thought this was a very respectable and well-reasoned answer coming from Barrett as most of her answers were she herself may not have any biases against gay people, but it’s not up to her to write the law. She’s not a legislator. She is merely there to interpret it save for giving a definitive answer like yes or no I will or won’t support gay marriage, which really these judges are not supposed to do in these hearings. This is probably the best type of answer Barrett.

Have Given But Still Senator Hirono Was Not

impressed, even though you didn’t give a direct answer. I think your response did speak volumes not once, but twice. You use the term sexual preference to describe those in the LGBtQ community and let me make clear sexual preference is an offensive and outdated term. It is used by anti–lgBtQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not wait what Barrett says that she does not discriminate on the basis of sexual preference and metis.

  • think discrimination abhorrent questions law
  • feinstein identify justice
  • justice scalia vocal dissent gay
  • democrats especially worried judge barrett
  • big topic discussion democrats lgbt

Hirono Turns That Into You Think Being Gay

is a choice. Those are some kathy Newman level debate tactics and judge Barrett bless her because she’s definitely not as familiar with how insincere the left can be, but she’ll learn she actually apologized for causing offense so in saying that I couldn’t opine on whether Obergefell was rightly decided or not. I. Not indicating disagreement with it. The point of not answering was to simply say it’s inappropriate for me to say a response, and the second point was to say that I certainly didn’t mean and you know would never mean to use a term that would cause any offense in the LGBtQ community.

So If I Did I Greatly

apologize for that I simply meant to be referring to Obergefell‘s holding with respect to same-sex marriage. I get that in regular conversation with normal people. If you say something that someone else misinterprets or take the wrong way. You may feel inclined to just apologize for it because you didn’t mean to upset them at all even if you technically didn’t say anything wrong as a Canadian.

I Am Usually All For Apologizing Profusely

over nothing but the thing is conversing with leftists is not a regular conversation and they. Not regular people never apologize to these people when they get offended because A They get offended all the time and B They’re like sharks. When they smell weakness they will circle and to really drive home the fact that no sexual preference is not a controversial term or at least it wasn’t until this week. I present to you This montage.

  • judge
  • scalia
  • discriminated
  • discrimination
  • feinstein

You Use The Term Sexual Preference To

describe those in the LGBtQ community and let me make clear. Sexual preference is an offensive and outdated term. This time bring everybody along regardless of color sexual preference based on whatever color, whatever what their sexual preference might be by race by age by sexual preference doesn’t matter what your sexual preference is what their sexual preference is never in the course of her military career had anything about her sexual preference had any impact based upon race color or. preference or sexual preference? I don’t think that you use the term sexual preference as just I don’t think it was an accident.

Our Society Has Come To Respect

people whatever their sexual preference. I’m not offended over the term sexual preference odds are you’re not offended over the term sexual preference and based off of how often they use it. I’m gonna go ahead and say the left isn’t actually offended over the term sexual preference either.

Summary

Judge Barrett said he would not ever discriminate on the basis of sexual preference . Barrett was asked if he would be a consistent vote to roll back protections for the LGBt community . Barrett: “I think discrimination is abhorrent on the questions of law.& However, I just because I’m a sitting judge and because you can’t answer questions without going through the judicial process can’t give answers to those very specific questions.& I thought this was a very respectable and well-reasoned answer coming from Barrett as most of her answers were she herself may not have any biases against gay people, but it’s not up to her to write the law. She is merely there to interpret it save for giving a definitive answer like yes or no I will or won’t support gay marriage, which really these judges are not supposed to do in these hearings,” said Hirono . Hironi . Judge Barrett is considered former Supreme Court Justice Scalia, somewhat of a mentor and justice Scalia was very vocal about his dissent for that gay marriage ruling ….. Click here to read more and watch the full video