Glenn Uncovers A Massive Hoax On The ENTIRE Gender Studies Community

Author:

Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV

author link

I Love This This A Hoax Done

by two academics who are tired of the academics who think they know everything and are are perpetrating what they think is a scam of Gender Studies. They wrote a paper the Penis as a social construct for gender studies and they were trying to get it published and they intentionally they said if one of us understood that we would write a paragraph and if one of us understood it, then they’d have to change it until it absolutely made no sense at all. So here are some of the examples in this double peer-reviewed study double peer-reviewed study that got high marks. We conclude that penises are best not best understood as the male sexual organ or as the male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations. The Penis presents significant problems for gender identity and reproductive identity within social and family dynamics.

Its Exclusionary To Disenfranchised Communities Based Upon Gender

or reproductive identity. It’s an enduring source of abuse for women and other gendered neutral marginalized groups and individuals. Is the universal performance source of rape and the conceptual driver behind much of climate change okay toxic toxic hyper masculinity derives its significance directly from the conceptual penis and applies itself to supporting neo capitalist materialism, which is a fundamental driver of climate change, especially in the rampant use of carbon emitted fossil fuel technologies and careless domination of virgin natural environments. We need not delve deeply into criticisms of dialectic objectivism or their relationships with masculine tropes. Like the conceptual penis to make effective of exclusionary dialectic objectivism.

  • masculinity
  • gender
  • gendered
  • reproductive
  • penis

All Perspective Matters They Write If Youre

having trouble understanding what any of this means There are two. important things to remember first, we don’t understand it and we wrote it Nobody does this problem should have rendered it unpublishable in all peer-reviewed academic journals Second. These examples are remarkably lucid compared to much would compare to much of the rest of the paper here’s another paragraph from it it is much as masculinity is except it is essentially performative, so too is the conceptual penis. The penis. In the words of Judith.

Butler Can Only Be Understood Through Reference To

what is barred from the signifier within the domain of corporal legibility. The penis should not be understood as an honest expression of the performers. Intent should it be presented in a performance of masculinity or hyper masculinity. Thus is morphism. The Issel morphism between the conceptual penis and what is referred to throughout discursive feminist literature as toxic hyper masculinity is one defined upon a vector.

Male Cultural Machismo With The Conceptual Penis

playing the roles of subject object and verb of action. The result of this trichotomy of roles is to place the hyper-masculine men both within and outside of competing discourses who dies whose dynamics as seen via post-structuralist discourse analysis and act a systemic interplay of power which the hyper-masculine men use the conceptual penis to move themselves from powerless subject to positions to powerful positions They right. No one knows what any of this means because we made it up in its complete nonsense. Anyone claiming to understand this is pretending full-stop you.

  • problematic society future generations penis
  • toxic hyper masculinity derives significance
  • conceptual penis referred discursive feminist
  • paper penis social construct gender
  • gender studies trying published intentionally

Summary

I love this this a hoax done by two academics who are tired of the academics who think they know everything and are perpetrating what they think is a scam of Gender Studies . They wrote a paper the Penis as a social construct for gender studies and they were trying to get it published and they intentionally they said if one of us understood it, then they’d have to change it until it absolutely made no sense at all . The Penis presents significant problems for gender identity and reproductive identity within social and family dynamics . Its exclusionary to disenfranchised communities based upon gender or reproductive identity . It’s an enduring source of abuse for women and other gendered neutral marginalized groups and individuals . Is the universal performance source of rape and the conceptual driver behind much of climate change . The conceptual penis and applies itself to supporting neo capitalist materialism, which is a fundamental driver of climate Change, which applies to neo capitalist Materialism, especially in the rampant use of fossil fuel technologies and careless domination of virgin natural environments…. Click here to read more and watch the full video