Video Creator’s Channel Dr. Steve Turley

• credibility
• news
• conspiracies
• trump
• credible

Either Uk Well Im Sure By Now

Many of you are all too familiar with the fake news mean that’s being spouted throughout the archaic media. The basic gist of the arguments that Donald Trump won at least in part because of the omnipresence of so-called fake news that is false reports of Hillary Clinton and her health or criminality and conspiracies regarding our global finance, Sears and the like and so there’s been this call among members of the archaic media to purge such articles and websites from social media outlets such as Facebook and Twitter and of course expose fake news websites that we’ve seen are believed in Washington Post in New York Times Clinton of course that blasted what she called the epidemic of fake news for her loss and and now we have reports from the UK that they’ve uncovered evidence significance as significant election tampering. Russia, which is galvanizing globalist politicians on both sides of the political aisle Nope I think we need to understand what’s going on here at at at least three distinct levels. Politically, the Democrats and centrist Republicans are just trying to weaken Trump as much as they possibly can he hit the ground running with the carrier deal saving a thousand jobs the Japanese conglomerate Softbank pledging 50 billion dollars in venture capital to create 50 thousand new jobs in the Dow around 20,000 and he’s not I mean he’s not even freaking President Yeah and all of this is going on Chris Wallace did the Fox News interview with him on Sunday morning and in in the promo for he basically came out and said well. This is going to be an interview with the president-elect who frankly looks more like the President of the United States right now.

I Think The Political Establishment Is Doing Everything

that they can to weaken. What appears to be a very politically strong present in the lack so that’s that’s one level on another level the level of what I might call the Archaic media we have to remember that the Archaic media was utterly humiliated the morning of November nine. I think in many respects like it’s never been humiliated before the morning that our nation woke up to the day after the November eighth election was nothing nothing at all like what the Archaic media not only predicted, but openly advocated the media morally denounced the Trump campaign and they acted as if such denunciation was on behalf of the vast majority of the American electorate. They of course turned out not to just simply be wrong. They turned out to be dead wrong they they could not have been.

More Wrong In For For A

number of reasons that I’ve laid out in detail in some of my earlier videos that you can get on my Youtube channel, particularly the videos leading up to the election the week going towards that Tuesday the primary reason I would argue being what has been called the the brexit blowback that scholars have recognized is taking place all throughout the world. In response to the D traditional izing anti cultural dynamics inherent in globalization. I I would recommend just one of the last videos I did on what’s really behind Trump’s flag burning ban where you’ll see I make up. I analyze the distinction between the sacred cows of globalized societies and the sacred cows are symbols nationalistic societies they’re very different. They both have their sacred symbols, but globalized societies almost true to form true to the term their sacred cows.

Are Our Human Rights Theyre Trans National

They’re trans cultural, whereas nationalist sacred cows are radically cultural. They’re radically customary, and they revolve around flags and religions and the light so there is a there’s been a clear worldwide nationalist populist blowback against these globalizing tendencies that were considered increasingly not just not just trans-cultural, but actually anti-cultural d traditional izing so Trump tapped into that blowback as evidenced by the mass support he receive an hour. Rust Belt states leading up to the election, which was acknowledged even by the archaic media totally irrespective of any supposed Russian election tavern. Nevertheless, I think in many respects the media is just trying to save face they’re trying to salvage whatever credibility they have left over from there utterly disgraceful election health They were humiliated as they should have been and their credibility was shattered It was utterly tarnish. As we now know both from the coverage itself as well as from UK These so-called fact checkers were in fact political advocates They were They were they were partisan chumps and again a number very prominent people even within the arcade media have have pointed that out all you have to do is watch the montages on UK all the way.

This Media Portrayed This Election In The Months

leading up to it. My one of my favorites was from UK Fareed Zakaria globalist Par excellence who predicted confidently a few weeks prior to the election, looking into the camera saying Trump will lose and the UK will be destroyed now. Since the election, Zakaria at least to some credit has admitted that he actually didn’t know what the heck he was talking about at least he’s admitting it now. This is this is very serious because the business. For the archaic media is one predicated on trust and integrity.

• fake media considers
• expose fake news
• work case fake news uk
• omnipresence called fake news
• uk sure familiar fake news

This Is Particularly Case For Example, The

New York Times. The reason why people avail themselves of the archaic media out poses precisely because they believe through such outposts they are receiving a responsible credible and accurate mediation of information and when it turns out that such outposts really are little more than cheap political propagandists. It has the potential for imploding their entire business model so the media has to save face here and it’s doing so I think ridiculously by concocting this epidemic whole fake news and so there’s the so-called dual discrediting going on in order to save face from their humiliatingly discredited election coverage. They’re doing everything they can to discredit transferred the alternative media and the the electoral makeup that that put him over the top well over the top over 300 electoral votes. Other words, they want to advance a narrative that they actually covered the election accurately, but that it was this mass poison of false narratives and stories that affected adversely a highly ignorant electoral demographic of rural voters were just too stupid to figure it out themselves so true to leftist form We members of the elite media need to do that for them.

We Need To Do That For

these clingers of guns and religion now at a deeper level. I I think and I the one I want to explore with you in detail. I think we need to take on the idea that the media outlets are arbiters of objective facts. I think most of you know it you know where I’m coming from. But there has actually been some very interesting studies that I think corroborate our intuition Here.

There Are A Number Of Assumptions

operative. In discounting certain news as fake not the least of which is what the media considers fact and we have a number of scholars who have observed that the way we actually think today A factual knowledge is actually a relatively recent invention. Perhaps the most interesting study of late comes from StalinNK] married Ruby, who argues that the modern fact developed within the rise of a democratic public arena and we can actually trace back to the first time we begin seeing numerical statistics cited as fast it’s in Europe. It’s in the 1820s and 1830s when we start actually citing statistics for knowledge and by the mid-19th century was actually the French who began to see things like statistics and facts is indispensable to the very transparency necessary for a functioning democracy. Facts were perceived as providing the populace with a sense of evaluative contribution to.

To And Control Over The Public Square

but more than that unlike the mystical governance that marks pre-modern societies facts reveal a reality considered completely uncontaminated by traditions, biases and prejudices. Facts facts Don’t require the the special knowledge of priests and prince who relied on non-numerical non-rational information such as divine revelation, ordination and tradition, a specialized knowledge, thereby limiting decision-making to a cloistered aristocracy rather modern modern facts are open to everyone it’s. It’s. It’s this world of modern facts that serves as a foundry for democracy and more than that it serves as a foundry for the modern what we’re increasingly calling archaic media a media story and Richard Kaplan has made some really interesting observations here. He argues that it’s in the early 20th century that you see a belief becoming prevalent among journalists that an objective press was absolutely essential for being able to escape.

This Point You Have To Remember That

the the media was basically a conglomerate of various different advocacies advocates for different political partisans, so journalists would actually use the term we a lot first-person plural to talk about what we believe and what we ought to be believing regarding political, economic, demographic social constituencies of the day. By the time you get into the early 20th century journalists start turning away from that because they think that politicians have too much sway over what constitutes news and event and they’re looking for an objective press that they so was necessary for the vibrant functioning of a democracy and escaping. The political advocacy that that characterized 19th century journalism and the influence of coercion of corrupt politicians that came with such advocacy so breaking the whole the politicians over journalism which had been amplified by highly partisan journalistic advocates the century. This was considered to be key to an informed public square there’s a real ideology behind this so journalists turn increasingly towards scientific rationalism and the adoption of modern facts as the the key methodology behind the reporting, which sought to analyze events objectively and impartial irrespective of the preconceptions of the reporter. The journalist would no longer serve as a partisan advocate as he had done all through the 19th century, but rather as an expert collector of information and short a purveyor of facts, but as Povey recognizes her research.

I Think Does A Very Nice Job Of

showing that modern facts are hardly objective. They’re rather loaded with theoretical assumptions about the nature of reality and the preconditions for knowledge specifically journalistic facts. From this this perspective of objective facts they they assume there’s an objective world out there that can be accurately represented through the naming. and categorizing of people and places.

In Other Words, Journalists All Too

often assume they really do. I believe they assume that there exists an independent reality external to their own representational systems. The problem here is noted by the anthropologist of media Mark Peterson is that this completely overlooks the whole question of whose perspective of reality right whose experience of the world is going to count as the empirical reality against which to evaluate other accounts. This is Peterson’s argument Peterson.

S Peterson Notes That The Issues Not So Much

whether things actually exist in the external world. Of course they do we bump into walls right it’s really more an issue of articulation of constructing accounts of these things. However, unbiased ones reporting purports to be the articulation of experience in words and images always remains a construction right. News reporting is inevitably made it’s not given it’s.

Not Discovered So Example When The Choice

is used between the word illegal immigrant and then undocumented work or in our case fake news. These are not UK cannot be neutral Choices. Each term has what Peterson notes is a different set.

Summary

Donald Trump won at least in part because of the omnipresence of so-called fake news that is false reports of Hillary Clinton and her health or criminality and conspiracies regarding our global finance, Sears and the like . There’s been this call among members of the archaic media to purge such articles and websites from social media outlets such as Facebook and Twitter and of course expose fake news websites that we’ve seen are believed in Washington Post in New York Times Clinton of course blasted what she called the epidemic of fake news for her loss and now we have reports from the UK that they’ve uncovered evidence significance as significant election tampering . Russia, which is galvanizing globalist politicians on both sides of the political aisle. The Democrats and centrist Republicans are just trying to weaken Trump as much as they possibly can he hit the ground running with the carrier deal with the Japanese conglomerate Softbank pledging 50 billion dollars in venture capital to create 50 thousand new jobs in the Dow around 20,000 and he’s not even…. Click here to read more and watch the full video