Video Creator’s Channel Just In
Order Would Have Made It So That
Amber heard did not have to make this testimony as public as it was made. So when Amber heard goes on Tv and is like no one should have to testify in public like that I think they did it to themselves. Then Miss Bretoff repeatedly disclosed in open court the most explosive protected of information imaginable. You can’t state that blumin in open courts regardless of who the blumin in open court. It’s a fair argument that there is certain testimony that shouldn’t be on Tv.
If Theres A Protective Order Blumin Abide
they could have very realistically put that testimony and segmented that testimony away just for the jury and clearing the courtroom out. Moreover, Elaine’s references to the allegations also violated the court’s directive not to talk about the case and thereby risk painting. Thereby risk painting the jury pool thanks for confirming it Elaine rather than answer the court’s straightforward question. Nevertheless, Miss Heard’s Counsel ran the stop sign and bulldozed ahead. Emily D Baker, a legal commentator who has worked as an L a district attorney, was raging on Youtube about how unprofessional Amber and her team were for all the years.
Amber Has Been Showing Up And
talking of her abuse by depth. She never mentioned with in-depth the sexual abuse the way she did on Tv. Apparently she wasn’t even supposed to have said that on open court to begin with. They were supposed to have had the jury and the judge for a closed session if she was going to talk about that because it is a sensitive matter. Elaine and Amber kept claiming how no one should have to testify in public like that when they themselves set.
- amber kept claiming
- order blumin abide realistically testimony
- testimony shouldn tv protective
- amber testified started
- certain testimony shouldn tv protective
Up There Was A Protective Order Over
that matter, but they never abided unless they should stop blaming anyone but themselves. It was also very improper that Amber’s Testament kept changing over and over with her teen claiming that the reason she won the Uk trial was because she kept changing her testimony. While Johnny didn’t the problem with changing testimonies is the fact that we knew she was lying we could tell she was acting while Johnny was being grounded to his initial statements, which made him more sincere as Mr. Depp’s counsel correctly predicted in their opening statements, Misheard did indeed deliver the performance of her life. In her direct examination, a spokesperson for Depp said in a statement to CnN of Herd‘s testimony, Mr.
Depps Recollections Have Remained Exactly The Same
throughout the six painful years since her first allegations were made Depp spokesperson added his truth. The truth is the same no matter the environment in which it has been presented and she could not let go of the fact that I was in on this post-up agreement. Also the way they tried to make the public feel foolish was unprofessional We as the public know that the person with the money will be the one requesting for a pre-or post–nuptial agreement and not the other way round. During depp’s testimony he said heard went into a tailspin over the possibility of a post–nuptial agreement which def’s lawyers have presented to her. He said he was surprised that she kept saying I’m not even in your will.
Im Not Even In Your Will.
He alleged. I thought that was an odd thing to say, especially since I don’t think anybody had had time to change wills or anything of that nature. Depp said it. could not let go of the fact that I was in on this post–nup agreement and that I was trying to trick her into essentially getting nothing if something were to happen.
Johnny Said He Would Tear It Up If
I he said if I if you ever brought one up to me or if I ever saw one got my hands on it. I’d tear it up. When amber testified she started talking of how she was the one who suggested a prenuptial agreement. He said if you ever brought one up to me or if ever saw one get my hands on it. I tear it up any way out of this is death.
The Only Way Out Of This Is Death.
She claimed she thought the prenup would eliminate suspicion or doubt and it would make things easier, but deb. She said took it as a sign. wanted to leave their marriage. The most unprofessionalism from Amber and her team came out when she changed her statement after court and started spreading rumors that Johnny hit her way before 2012.
I wasn’t hit so early in the relationship and still stayed. He was also sober for a period in 2012, which I clearly remember her saying she couldn’t forget that day since no one forgets when it first happens. She recalled that she was sitting on the couch with Depp in 2012 where the two were having a normal conversation. She stated that Depp had been drinking and believes he may have also used cocaine as she remembered a jar of cocaine out on the table heard said she asked him about a tattoo on his arm that looked like Black marks.
When Depp Replied That The Tattoo
said why no she laughed believing it was a joke heard said that he slapped her across the face. She testified that Depp hit her twice more the third time hitting her heart honestly it’s over now after everything was said and done it’s time for everyone to just stop a fan tweeted a reminder that the first of June 2022 Depp” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Johnny Depp went in a court of law he had already won in the court of public opinion after millions watched a six-week trial with overwhelming evidence that supported the truth. He told the victim. One everyone let’s not forget that this video is based on theories and my opinions and should not be considered facts that’s it for this video thanks for watching.
Elaine and Amber Heard kept claiming how no one should have to testify in public like that when they themselves set. up there was a protective order over that matter, but they never abided unless they should stop blaming anyone but themselves . Emily D Baker, a legal commentator who has worked as an L a district attorney, was raging on Youtube about how unprofessional Amber and her team were for all the years. She never mentioned with in-depth the sexual abuse the way she did on Tv.& Apparently she wasn’t even supposed to have said that on open court to begin with. They were supposed to . have had the jury and the judge for a closed session if she was going to talk about that because it is a . sensitive matter. It was also very improper that Amber’s Testament kept changing over and over with her teen claiming that the reason she won the trial was because she kept changing her testimony. She kept changing . Amber has been showing up and talking of her abuse by depth….. Click here to read more and watch the full video