Jim Jordan Slams Sondlands Scattered Testimony Ive Never Seen Anything Like This

Author:

Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV

author link

I Think The Gentleman For Yielding Ambassador

when did it happen when did what happen the announcement when did President Solinsky announce that the investigation was going to happen on page 14. You said this was there a quid pro quo today’s your opening statement as I testified previously with regard to a quite requested White House call White House meeting the answer is yes that there needed to be a public statement from President Szalinski. When the Chairman asked you about the Security Assistance dollars, you said there needed to be a public announcement from Szalinski. So I’m asking you a simple question. When did that happen never did never did they got the call July 25th.

  • szalinski
  • announce
  • announcement
  • ambassador
  • solinsky

They Got The Meeting Not In

the White House but in New York on September 25th. They got the money on September 11th when the meeting happen again never did you don’t. know who was in the meeting? Which meeting are you referring the meeting that never happened who was in it. You know how people you know how the ones there. You know how Szalinski announced it did he tweet it did he do a press statement did he do a press conference you know how that happened I mean you.

You Got All Three Of Them

wrong. They get the call they get the meeting they get the money. It’s not two plus two it’s over three. I mean I’ve never seen anything like this and and you told Mr. .

Kaster That The President Never Told You

that the announcement had to happen to get anything. In fact he didn’t just not tell you that he explicitly said the opposite the gentleman from Texas just read it you said to the President of the United States what do you want. From Ukraine the President I want nothing I want no quid pro quo I one’s Alinsky to do the right thing I want him to do what he ran on What do you run on Mr. . ambassador silent transparency and dealing with corruption right that’s right Mr.

.

Kaster raised another important point why didn’t you put that statement in your opening statement. I think you said you couldn’t fit it in is that right said we might be here for 46 minutes and it wasn’t five purposeful trust Me wasn’t purposeful no couldn’t fit it in a 23-page opener. The most important statement about the subject matter at hand. The president unites in a direct conversation with you about the issue at hand and the president says let me read it one more time what do you want from Ukraine Mr.

.

President I want nothing I want no quid pro. I want this new guy Brand new guy in politics his party just took over I ones Alinsky to do the right thing. I want him to run on and do what he ran on which is deal with corruption and you can’t find time to fit that in a 23-page opening statement, you know what a quid pro quo is. I do this for that right looks to me like Ukraine got that three times a week.

There Was No This There Was We We

didn’t do anything excuse me they didn’t have to do anything. I’ve never seen anything like that and this is this is when the call came out. You all remember this when the call came out, everyone said we’re gonna quid pro quo. There’s going to be a that was what was in the call and of course of course that didn’t happen that. happen remember what they what the complaint said Remember what the memo said of the whistleblower.

  • house white house meeting answer
  • did happen announcement did president
  • announcement szalinski asking simple
  • did president solinsky announce investigation
  • public statement president szalinski

This Call Was Frightening.

This call was scary. All those things no that materialized none of that materialized I yield back.

Summary

Ambassador to Ukraine said there needed to be a public announcement from President Szalinski about the Security Assistance dollars . Ambassador Kaster said the president never told you that the announcement had to happen to get anything . Mr. Kaster raised another important point why didn’t you put that statement in your opening statement.& It’s not two plus two it’s over three.& I mean I’ve never seen anything like this. I want nothing I want no quid pro quo I one’s Alinsky to do the right thing I want him to do what he ran on. What do you run on Mr.&.& ambassador silent transparency and dealing with corruption right that’s right Mr. &.& Kaster.& The ambassador to Ukraine was asked to testify about the meeting that never happened. I think the gentleman for yielding ambassador when did it happen when the meeting happen again never did you don’t know who was in the meeting again. It’s over three times….. Click here to read more and watch the full video