Video Creator’s Channel Dr. Steve Turley

Hey Gang Its Me Dr Steve Does This Look
familiar I’m coming to you from my old stomping grounds. My old office Where it All Began, but something else is beginning isn’t it and that’s Carrie Lakes absolute bombshell of a case against the single most corrupt Secretary of State in the nation. Katie Hobbs We’ve got some great news. Carrie Lake has won the preliminary stages of her lawsuit. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson has approved of Kerry Lake’s request to have ballots inspected as she prepares for her trial and her ongoing challenge to Katie Hobbs.
As I Understand That Arizona Law Provides For
a candidate challenging an election result to call for a ballot inspection to prepare for the suit and the judge granted three of lakes Four demands. He’s allowing the inspection of 50 random ballot on demand printed ballots 50 random early ballots. and 50 random ballot on demand ballots marked spoiled the one request he denied for whatever reason is that they would not be allowed to examine 50 random early ballot envelopes, which for me is unfortunate because those envelopes are an integral part of the signature verification process. Right you have to sign both the ballot and the envelope and both signatures have to match the signature that’s on file with your voter registration as I understand all parties have until well they had until yesterday to submit their choice. A ballot inspector to the court and it looks like the next thing.
Well See Is Some Kind Of
evaluative process for the ballots which of course Kerry’s side would have to agree to now remember the key here in all of this is that Kerry does not have to prove that any kind of election fraud took place that’s. Not what Arizona law requires all one has to do show that there were irregularities, mishaps, mistakes, submissions or other issues that bring the election out outcome into doubt. In other words, all one has to do is to show that there were fallible faulty issues during the electoral process and then show how that fallibility could and that’s key could have inordinately affected the outcome of the election that’s it that’s Carrie Lake’s case in nutshells I understand it. She doesn’t have to prove that there was any fraud or any intentional mismanagement or any other Shenanigans going on. All.
- ballots
- ballot
- signatures
- judge
- signature
She Has To Do Show That There Were
indeed a number of fallible mishaps, irregularities and other issues that potentially affected the outcome of the election, and this is precisely what her lawsuit does and so with this win. Kerry Lake can now examine and the Integrity of several. Facets of the election so first and foremost of course, they can look at the signatures on the mail-in ballots for signature verification that’s one of the issues. One of the main issues She’s raised in her lawsuit. Her suit alleges that Maricopa County officials election officials failed to properly vet tens of thousands of signatures on their ballots and then and and then included those failed vetted signatures ballot signatures into into the vote total um this coming from eyewitness testimony that eyewitness testimony is alleging that workers throughout thousands of mismatched signatures, but that was overturned by somebody higher up in the supervisory chain.
- request ballots inspected prepares
- ballots huge lawsuit kerry lake
- place arizona law requires irregularities
- lake case understand ballots
- arizona law provides candidate
So According To This Eyewitness Testimony, Theres
a bit of a mystery to be solved here as to who that person was calling those shots now for me. The big question is whether this process of examination will allow Kerry Lake’s team to be. to verify the chain of custody involved in these sample ballots and that’s a huge part of a lawsuit. Kerry Lake’s attorneys are alleging that Maricopa County officials violated Arizona chain of custody laws for hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots okay the key here is that with no chain of custody, then there’s no way to tell whether over 300 000 ballots cast in Maricopa County are legal ballots and again. This is key you’re just trying to establish irregularity so as to cast doubt on enough ballots so as to issue a runoff or even in overturning the election.
The Lawyer Robert Barnes Has Made The Analogy
of evidence tampering in the legal sphere and we talked about this in another video earlier this week so the way you guard against evidence Tampering is by chain of custody by accounting for every place that the evidence has been. The judicial process so there’s an accounting and verification process when the evidence is received when the where the evidence is taken where the evidence is stored who has access to it. If at any point that evidence falls out of the chain of custody. If clear accounting and verification, the chain of custody is broken that evidence is now inadmissible not because it did get tampered with, but what because it could have been tampered with and that’s the heart of Kerry Lake‘s case as I understand it all she has to do is show that these ballots at some point fell outside the objectively verifiable chain of custody and therefore they could they could have been tampered with and that’s enough to render them invalid.
So For Me Itd Be Very Interesting To
see as part of this ballot examination process if they’re going to be able to. Examine the chain of custody verification as an integral part of the Integrity of the ballot so great news for Kerry again I mentioned in an earlier video. There was a case in Eatonville Florida Okay Eatonville is just outside of Orlando. There was a case just a few months back, where a judge actually ordered that a sitting councilman be removed from office 20 months after he was sworn in precisely because of the evidence of voter fraud.
The Judge Ruled That It Fellow By The
name of Taurus Mock had to vacate a seat on the Eatonville Town Council and give it to his Challenger precisely because the judge saw enough evidence of voter fraud. So the Judiciary does move at its own Temple Tempo, but the results can be amazing so we’ll keep it really really really close eye on what’s coming up next for Kerry as. Always make sure to smack that Bell And subscribe button you will definitely want to check out my latest video on the Legacy Media Meltdown as Woke leftists get canceled on Twitter cancel culture of Karma‘s a isn’t it make sure to click on that link and I’ll see you over there God bless.
Summary
Carrie Lake has won the preliminary stages of her lawsuit against Katie Hobbs . Judge Peter Thompson has approved of Kerry Lake’s request to have ballots inspected as she prepares for her trial and her ongoing challenge . Kerry does not have to prove that any kind of election fraud took place that’s. Not what Arizona law requires all one has to do is to show that there were irregularities, mishaps, mistakes, submissions or other issues that bring the election out outcome into doubt . The one request he denied for whatever reason is that they would not be allowed to examine 50 random early ballot envelopes, which for me is unfortunate . Those envelopes are an integral part of the signature verification process. Both signatures have to match the signature that’s on file with your voter registration as I understand all parties have until well they had until yesterday to submit their choice. The next thing. A ballot inspector to the court and it looks like the next thing is to be the next step. Kerry’s side would have to agree to…. Click here to read more and watch the full video