Video Creator’s Channel Just In
As Against Amber Heard We The Jury Award
compensatory damages in the amount of 10 million dollars. The defamation trial between Depp and Heard has been the most talked about topic for months and what’s gotten it more fame is how completely different the Virginia court verdict is from the Uk verdict comparing the two verdicts. It’s been concluded that the British judge did one thing he ignored certain crucial evidence and boom Amber won what evidence indicates that the Uk judge ignored crucial details supporting depth to make Amber win was the judge bribed or Amber effortlessly played on his sentence. We are sure you want to know what happened so let’s get right into the video back. In 2020.
Depp Sued The Sun Newspaper For Defamation
and Amber was a witness at this trial. She went on and on about how Depp allegedly assaulted her and trust me. The judge took it line hook and sinker. The judge ignored most if not all of depp’s defending evidence and with the outcome of the trial. It’s logical to say that the judge tilted solely on amber’s side well who knows law better than lawyers themselves.
So Lets See What Legal Practitioners
think about this Mark Stevens, an international media lawyer told the Bbc that it’s very rare that essentially the same case is tried on two sides of the pond and gets different results well. It is indeed very rare to provide the same evidence to two courts and get different results. Stevens believes the main factor that influenced Mr. Depp’s victory in America was the fact that his U. s trial was before a jury while his Uk trial was before a judge.
Only Amber Heard Has Comprehensively Lost In The
court of public opinion and in front of. The jury he said in the Uk trial Mr. Stevens said the judge recognized the strategy and dismissed a lot of the evidence that did not directly address whether Mr. Depp committed assault or not. Lawyers and judges tend not to fall for it, but it’s very very effective against juries.
He Said People Have A Paradigm In
their mind of how a victim of abuse might be like and how they might behave and of course we all know that’s often false. He continued they deny that their client did anything. They deny that they’re the real perpetrator and they attacked the credibility of the individual calling up the abuse and then reverse the roles of the victim and the offender. He added this means that amber might have preyed on the Uk judge’s sentiment and that awarded her win in the same vein. Some believe that she might.
Even Have Bribed Him Into Ignoring Depps
evidence who knows that could be true persephone Bridgeman Baker, a partner at libel specialist Carter Ruck has also shared her view stating that the U.s jury believed Depp there seems no more obvious explanation that the jury simply believed Depp’s evidence in the U. s proceedings. There was more evidence in the U. s proceedings about herd’s credibility on which the judge in the Uk placed little importance that is likely to have been a deliberate strategic decision by Depp‘s team.
While The Judge In The Uk
proceedings decided heard was a credible witness that additional evidence may have swung a jury. She added team Depp relies strongly on the claim that the Uk trial was handled with total unprofessional behavior. One fan wrote I haven’t read the whole judgment for the Uk trial, but I read that the judge cited her donation as. proof that she was sincere and if that’s the case this whole case could legit just hinge on that misrepresentation alone that being said I’ll bet everything. I have that Johnny wouldn’t touch an appeal with a 10-foot pole.
- judge
- judgment
- verdicts
- verdict
- defamation
I Accept Her Evidence Was Her Lying
on the stand. She agreed with the nurse’s notes that helped her case and disagreed when they didn’t. This is what people mean when the judge took her word alone above other witnesses in evidence another added while another fan commented what’s with this logic that the Uk verdict is more worth than the virginia verdict. The Uk was libeled by three parties newspaper who took Amber heard’s word without verifying her claims Virginia was against Amber herself. Her first-hand defamation account full of lies hashtag Johnny Depp got justice.
However, Team Amber Believes Their Adored Actress Won
the Uk trial fair and square. of the verdict from the Us trial, Amber’s accusations against Depp are still valid. One fan wrote Johnny is officially innocent no he isn’t. He won a case saying his career was damaged by Amber writing a piece about her abuse. He is still legally a life beater as he lost the Uk case.
- win judge bribed amber
- depp won trial knows amber
- newspaper defamation amber witness trial
- amber preyed uk judge sentiment
- verdict trial amber accusations depp
This Was To Silence Victims And
you all support it because you don’t truly stand with victims since all the headlines just want to say Johnny won let me just remind everyone that while he won this libel case with a jury that was not sequestered and kept away from his smear campaign. He was found guilty of 12 cases of abuse against Amber in the Uk case. Another wrote the Aquaman actress might have been exonerated in the Uk trial, but with proven evidence depp won the U. s trial while no one knows how Amber’s.
Appeal Will Turn Out Its Clear Who The
members of the U.s jury believe do you think the Us trial was handled with professional conduct compared to the Uk trial or do you think Amber prayed on the Uk judge sentiment to favor her Let us know what you think in the comment section below. Don’t forget to like this video and subscribe to this channel If you haven’t see you next time.
Summary
The defamation trial between Depp and Heard has been the most talked about topic for months and what’s gotten it more fame is how completely different the Virginia court verdict is from the Uk verdict comparing the two verdicts . Mark Stevens, an international media lawyer told the Bbc that it’s very rare that essentially the same case is tried on two sides of the pond and gets different results well . He said in the Uk trial Mr.& Stevens said the judge recognized the strategy and dismissed a lot of the evidence that did not directly address whether Mr. Depp committed assault or not . Only Amber heard has comprehensively lost in the court of public opinion and in front of the public opinion . As against Amber heard we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of 10 million dollars. As againstmber heard weThe jury award the jury at the U.S. court we the . jury award £1,000,000 to £2,000. to Amber heard £3,000 ….. Click here to read more and watch the full video