Video Creator’s Channel Russell Brand

Pfizer Have Just Released A 55 000 Page

document about vaccines and their efficiency. Even though the food and drug administration wanted to delay the release by 75 years Basically After everyone alive now is dead, so we’re asking why is it so difficult to talk openly about vaccines Hello. There you 5. 3 million awakening wonders there’s a light within you and it’s getting brighter. I know how challenging it is to be alive.

I Know What You Face I Know What

you have to get through we’re all on our individual journeys back here we can coalesce and come together communicate openly and ask the difficult questions have the difficult conversations today’s conversation being of course, why did the food and drug administration want to delay information about vaccine efficiency by 75 years? Why is that in a climate where many people are skeptical and doubtful one environment where people are neither skeptical or doubtful? Is at my live shows you can come and see me if you’re in the Uk or if you want to travel here you can do that now you can come see me in a couple of weeks in Carlisle, you can see me in Newcastle Stockton Aunties, Glasgow, Plymouth, Bristol all over this beautiful country in fantastic places see me live more than just stand-up comedy an opportunity to ask me questions and meditate if you want to do things like that that’s literally up to you as are all things apparently other than openly discussing vaccines now as i always have to say to you on our current beloved platform. We have to be careful about what we say I’m not offering you medical advice. I’m. Making any suggestions to you as to what you should do for your health for your family’s health what I’m doing here is looking at a very interesting story. The story being that the food and Drug administration wanted to delay the release of documents pertaining to the efficacy of vaccines and information around their trials side effects for 75 years, but Pfizer have released a 55 000 word document due to a judge saying that they have to release it so that’s good once in a while there are positive things that come out of these stories well that’s good there’s a democratic check and balance in place there that’s led to some transparency but is it total transparency and what’s the resistance let’s get into the story in a 55 000 page set of documents released in the last few weeks the U.

• vaccine
• vaccines
• vaccinated
• pandemic
• fda

S Food And Drug Administration Center.

for biologics evaluation and research. CBer is for the first time allowing the public to access data pfizer submitted to the FDa from its clinical trials in support of a Covid19 vaccine license. This follows U. s district judge Mark T Pittman’s decision on January the 6th to deny the request from the FDa to suppress the data for the next 75 years which the agency claims was necessary in part because of its limited resources.

• vaccines say current beloved platform
• asking difficult talk openly vaccines
• discussing vaccines say current
• people skeptical mandates people vaccinated
• think lot skepticism vaccines came

Weve Got So Few Resources In The

pharmaceutical industry. It’s been a tough couple of years tightening the belts. We’ve barely scraped together a few pennies. What with conditions we’ve all been hit quite hard by the pandemic over in the pharmaceutical industry would you give us a bit of time to get ourselves together sure how long well just I don’t know two three generations so that everyone alive now would be dead what. That in itself suggests is that there’s something to hide I’m not saying that there’s something to hide I’m saying a request to delay the release of information by 75 years.

Doesnt Feel Like Transparency And Querying That Doesnt

make you a conspiracy theorist that makes you someone who makes rational evaluations based on data. This is from those conspiracy theorists Wacko Cowboy Loonies Oh the British medical journal Hey, what should we put in today Let’s put in the lollipops of magic. Let’s put in the unicorns are real in the pages of the British medical journal God Bless You Your Majesty a decade ago in the middle of a different pandemic. It came to light that governments around the world have spent billions stockpiling antivirals for influenza that had not been shown to reduce the risk of complications hospital admissions or death. The majority of trials that underpinned.

Regulatory Approval And Government Stockpiling Of Osultamiva, Better

known as Tamiflu was sponsored by the manufacturer. Most were unpublished. Those that were published were ghosts written by writers paid by the manufacturer. The people listed as principal authors lacked access to the raw data and academics who requested access to the data for independent analysis were denied complicated case Watson. The Tamiflu saga heralded a decade of unprecedented attention to the importance of sharing clinical trial data public battles for drug company data transparency campaigns with thousands of signatures strengthened journal data sharing requirements, explicit commitments from companies to share data, new data, access, website portals and landmark transparency policies from medicines.

Regulators All Promised A New Era

in data transparency. Progress was made but clearly not enough. The errors of the last pandemic are being repeated. Memories are short today. Despite the global rollout of Covid19 vaccines and treatments.

The Anonymized Participant Level Data Underlying The Trials

for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors researchers and the public and are likely to remain that way for years to come doctors, researchers and the public can the public see no those idiots we don’t trust them. We’re not going to tell them anything what about researchers it would really help with the research. No no they come to their own conclusions in my files with their dirty little hands, what if they’ve had a jam sandwich all right all right what about doctors doctors Don’t trust those guys in a white coat stethoscope. This is morally indefensible for all trials, but especially for those involving major health interventions. It’s indefensible morally all right we’ll do it immorally Then Oh i’m sorry I didn’t realize you’re willing to behave sorry carry on carry on, especially as it involved major public.

Health Interventions I Think That A

lot of skepticism around vaccines came from people that were uncertain about the unprecedented scale of what was happening. I remember rather fondly the enthusiasm of the beginning of the pandemic, where, in spite of our shared fear there was at least a sense of collective duty that we all had to obey government edicts Because life was at stake life of people. We didn’t know strangers loved ones whoever the life is important and above all else we’re here to protect one another and love one another. I’m laughing because elsewhere in society you don’t see those values playing out, But I for one was optimistic to see that happen as things went on and their medical solutions began to present themselves. It was interesting to see how it was conveyed through the media and what kind of information was verboten What kind.

Of Things You Couldnt Talk About Now Down

the line. The narrative has altered. Of course, the global circumstances have shifted interestingly and also there are things that you couldn’t talk about that you now can talk about natural immunity. Wan Lab leak theory all things that once upon a yesterday were regarded entirely as the domain of the crackpot Tinfoil hat wearing nutters right but now the narrative is changing so when you have a situation where the British medical journal are saying that these are morally indefensible actions. The way these trials have been handled.

How Do You Now Regard The

attitudes of the skeptical or people that were anti-vaxxed and by anti-vaxx just to be clear I don’t mean people that are anti-vaccines. Oh no that’s not What anti-vaxx means people that were skeptical about mandates because many people that are themselves vaccinated were circumspect about the application of mandates and the negative impact they would have often on communities that are already poor or disadvantaged in some other ways or indeed people from any background that just believe in bodily autonomy, so it’s interesting to hear the British medical journal respond to this information in this way. These are not my opinions. This is me reading from the British medical journal and applying that information to a narrative we’ve all been living within to one degree or another for the last couple of years. I should point out of course that the British government were holding parties during most of that time, so not everyone was living within those restrictions among regulators the Us Food and Drug administration is believed to receive the most raw data.

Does Not Proactively Release Them Why Do We

even need an adverb proactively release them? You don’t have to proactively release them just release them. People can read the information for themselves who well. I don’t know the public researchers no doctors The FDa is producing data only for pfizer’s vaccine other manufacturers data cannot be requested. Why just can’t industry which holds the raw data is not legally required to honour requests for access from independent researchers. Some people say Russell you’re not making enough suggestions for how to change reality well watch the videos more carefully because I’m always making suggestions and here’s another one that should be allowed regulate that right now you do have to as well as access to underlying data.

Transparent Decision Making Is Essential For Those Of

you watching this and I don’t mean you our beloved 5.3 million who I treasure and cherish and want to help shine. I mean people that watch this stuff deliberately with an antagonistic agenda particularly specifically to box this off as anti-facts that’s anti-vaxx He’s a conspiracy theorist here’s what I’m not saying I’m not saying you shouldn’t take the vaccine I don’t mind I’m not saying the vaccines Don’t work I don’t know what I’m saying is there’s clear evidence that there’s a lack of transparency that the British medical Journal says he’s immoral immoral and that leads to at least skepticism sometimes cynicism, possibly hesitancy sometimes in a climate, where we know how big pharma have behaved in the past down right doubt and resistance can you see why that might be happening under these circumstances Wouldn’t it be nice. Hey listen look I know you’re worried about this stuff Here’s all the data there’s all the data check it out read it yourself we’re so confident in this product. We’re so confident in this situation and our decisions that you can just read what you want and then you can decide based on what’s wrong with that do you want to buy a car could I have a look at it no well why are you a conspiracy theorist no just like look at the car before I buy you can’t look at that car.

What Are You A Pervert A Right-Wing Conspiracy

No i don’t want to look at the car have a look around it see if it works or not no you can’t it’s private. You can have a look in 75 years yeah but by then 75 years you can look otherwise you’re a conspiracy. What are you an anti-cara? Oh Yeah are you an empty car? I don’t even know what you’re trying to say. I’m trying to buy the car 75 years. I’ll see you in 75 years you’re bloody conspiracy furious where’s your tin hat.

Big Pharma Is The Least Trusted Industry At

least three of the many companies making Kovid 19 vaccines have passed criminal and civil settlements, costing them billions of dollars. It’s only a civil dispute what about those criminal ones. Oh yeah Yeah no no there are some criminal ones as well, but still would you trust us. We’ll tell you in 75.

Summary

Pfizer have just released a 55 000 page document about vaccines and their efficiency . Even though the food and drug administration wanted to delay the release by 75 years Basically After everyone alive now is dead, so we’re asking why is it so difficult to talk openly about vaccines . Why is that in a climate where many people are skeptical and doubtful one environment where people are neither skeptical or doubtful? Is at my live shows you can come and see me if you’re in the UK or if you want to travel here you can do that now . You can come see me in Carlisle, Newcastle Stockton Aunties, Glasgow, Plymouth, Bristol, Bristol all over this beautiful country in fantastic places see me live more than just stand-up comedy an opportunity to ask me questions and meditate if you like to do things like that that’s literally up to you as are all things that are up to your own choice to do . I’m not offering you medical advice.& We have to be careful about what…. Click here to read more and watch the full video