Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV

About 50 Years Ago William Proxmeyer Rose In This

esteemed body and told us about government waste. He called it the Golden Police Award. They were studying things like dating and love and what makes love and we had these great scientific studies about love. These are William Proxmeyer’s words from the early 1970s he was a conservative Democrat. He says I object to this study on love because no one even the Nile National Science Foundation can argue that falling in love is a science not only because I’m sure that even if they spend 84 million or 84 billion, they would not get an answer that anyone would believe.

Im Also Against This Study On Love Because

I don’t want the answer. I believe that 200 million other Americans want to leave some things in life a mystery and right on top of the things that we don’t. need to know is why a man falls in love with a woman or vice versa stirring words The Golden Fleece award I remember as a kid everybody talked about it. It was in the newspapers so what have we done to curb the wasteful appetite the abuse of government that happens in the National Sounds Foundation since 1972 not a damn thing here’s one of my other favorites from William Proxmeyer’s days the UK was named for spending 57 000. On a study of the physical measurements of 432 Airline stewardesses.

These Included The Distance From The Knees From

knee to knee while sitting and the length of the buttocks fifty-eight thousand dollars. This was your government money at being put to good use so fast forward and we spend about eight billion dollars a year with the National Science Foundation is it getting any better are they. doing a better job at overseeing their money well? I don’t know this bill is going to increase their funding by 68 percent. There’s 29 billion dollars in this bill for the National Science Foundation. So don’t you think the American people deserve to know where their money’s being spent.

This Was From Their Sister Agency

theNK], but you know we can’t get started without talking about it. This is over eight hundred thousand dollars to study whether or not Japanese Quail are more sexually promiscuous on cocaine. I’m not making this up eight hundred thousand dollars of taxpayer money to study whether Japanese quail or more sexually promiscuous on cocaine. You think we could have just pulled the audience. You think we could have just said what do you think because that’s sort of the answer the answer is yes and yet your government spent 800 Grand on.

On That And Then When We Pointed It

out five years ago, did they do anything to reform it No they’re here today to give the agencies that are doing this research more money. Another one that I think is quite revealing is this study is about Panamanian male frog calls So you have about a half a million dollars and they wanted to know whether or not. The male mating call is different in the country than it is in the city. Now coming from a rural State like Kentucky. I can tell you the male mating call is different in the country than it is in the city, but nobody in Kentucky wants a half a million dollars spent on a Panamanian Frog’s male mating call.

This Is Not A Good Use

of money. So if someone told you your government was spending this money would you give. them more would you give the agency more if they were doing this or less? I think less in looking at the National Science Foundation’s funding, we also found that they spent thirty thousand dollars studying Ugandan gambling habits really we’re studying why people gamble in Uganda. Why there’s a black market in Uganda well. You know what I think we know the reason when government oppresses business and regulates business to death.

They Go To The Black Market So If

you make something illegal you often get more of it, but we spent thirty thousand dollars traveling over to Uganda to study their gambling habits Utter waste of money. We should not reward these people with more money. We spent about a half a million on a video game. This is an app for your phone. I know we all need things to do when we should be working.

Or At School This Is An

app for school children to teach them alarmism over climate change. So you can click on the app and it’ll scare you to death that California is going to be underwater or not 100 years. None of which is true, all of which is alarmism and a half a million dollars spent by the government to alarm our school children’s not a good idea. This next study points out a problem with funding in general in our government. You give funds for something that ostensibly might be a good cause.

So A Couple Of Years Ago They Gave

money for autism seven hundred thousand dollars for autism. You think well autism you know even myself as conservative as I am I could probably say well that’s a something we ought to study autism well. They subcontracted 700 Grand of it to a bunch of. Egghead researchers to watch Neil Armstrong’s statement on the moon. You remember the black and white photo.

• william proxmeyer love
• research money think quite revealing
• send millions dollars research don
• democrat says object study love
• science foundation argue falling love

Hes On The Moon And He Says

one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind, or did he really say one small step for a man. So these researchers took seven hundred thousand dollars to listen to that crackly old cassette recording and find out did he say man or did he say Amen so we studied the preposition a and we spent 700 Grand listening to the tape over and over and over again and you know what they determined They just can’t decide they’re unsure, but they did recommend more money to study the problem. Further this is insulting to the American taxpayer. We should not be giving these people more money we should be giving them dramatically less money, but it also points out one of the reforms. That I have proposed for this agency? One of the problems with the National Science Foundation is if I want to do research on JApanese Quail Snorting cocaine guess what I can ask for the same people that are studying snorting cocaine in animals.

I Can Ask Them To Be On My

peer committee. I can choose the people on my peer committee so if I want to study animal Snorting cocaine. I pick other researchers who are studying animal snorting cocaine guess what they tend to say yes if they say yes the scientific science gets on the next peer commission and he says or she says yes for their snorting cocaine research. This is crazy. We should not let these so-called scientists pick who’s on their committee not only that I think we ought to have a taxpayer.

Advocate Could We Not Have Just Someone

with a good. of common sense that says we shouldn’t take autism money steal it and spend it on a bunch of idiots listening to what Neil Armstrong said we landed on the Moon. So that is part of the reform that we should have one of my other all-time favorites from the National Science Foundation. This kind of goes back to William Proxmeyer and love and happiness. They wanted to know if you take a selfie of yourself while smiling and you look at it.

Later In The Day Will That Make

you happy really that’s a half a million dollars. I don’t think we need a scientist to say that that’s UK and the government’s got no business doing this kind of research. I don’t even know how you can even call This research with a straight face but it goes on year on year on and you think we’ve been. About this since 1972 you’d think maybe we’d have less of it. We’re giving them more money, so we’re now increasing their budget by 68 percent.

Despite This Kind Of Research.

The last one I have is this. We spent 1. 3 million dollars on insect ranching. This is money that was sent to study whether or not we could put insects into animal feed.

We Spent Another Three Million Dollars,

though wanting to know if humans would eat ants to prevent climate change. What will you do America to combat climate change, will you eat ants to combat climate change that was a study. This is not science. This is ridiculous in nature. Not shall light I’ve got one more example, we spent 1.

5 Million Studying Lizards On A Treadmill.

So I know you’ve all been curious when lizards walk and they kind of waddle and they have a funny. walk why do they walk that way? What’s going on in their knee joints? What do their hip joints look like when they waddle across the lawn? Everybody wants to know that? But are you willing to spend a million and a half of your taxpayer dollars to take X-rays live real-time X-rays of a lizard walking on a treadmill I tend to think you know maybe Alzheimer’s research maybe cancer research maybe heart research but spending good Hard Cash on X-rays of a lizard on a treadmill do not strike me as the most pressing concerns of government, so Mr. President I would argue that instead of increasing their money, we should be decreasing their money. We also need to have oversight on where our money is being spent.

Theres A Great Deal Of Circumstantial

evidence now that UK money went to the Wan Virology Institute there’s a great. least suggesting that the pandemic may have started there. We don’t know for certain I’m not saying that it did. But there is evidence now that suggests that it might have number one. There is no animal host for Covet 19.

We Have Not Found Of The Thousands Of

animals we tested in the wet Market. None of them had coveted 19. when you take Covid-19 and you try to infect bats, which is where most coronavirus come from What do you discover you discover that Covid-19 is actually not very well infected in bats. The bats don’t catch it very easily. It seems as if Covid-19 is most adapted for humans, but if it came from animals shouldn’t there be an animal host that is readily infected by this.

• research
• love
• researchers
• studies
• scientific

The Other Evidence We Have In The Last

couple of days is confirmation that three individuals at the Wan Institute. November of last year sick enough to be in the hospital from a virus that was previously undisclosed They worked in the WAn Institute. We’re told this came from the wet Market lab from exotic animals, but not one animal tested positive for the virus. So we have an amendment. We’re hoping that will be adopted by this body that says gain of function research as defined by the UK In 2014 will not be permitted in China.

We Will Not Fund It With American

dollars, but it’s like so much waste in government. I think there’s no reason to be sending any money to CHina for research. They’re a rich country for goodness sakes. We’re worried about them out competing us stealing our intellectual property and then we send them millions of dollars to do research.

Why Dont They Spend Their Own Money And

do we trust them enough. Are they open enough to tell us what’s going on in the lab, but we want to give them money. I think without question.

Summary

William Proxmeyer Rose in this esteemed body and told us about government waste . He called it the Golden Police Award. The UK was named for spending 57 000. dollars on a study of the physical measurements of 432 Airline stewardesses.& These included the distance from the knees from knee to knee while sitting and the length of the buttocks fifty-eight thousand dollars.& This was your government money at being put to good use so fast forward and we spend about eight billion dollars a year with the National Science Foundation. I don’t know this bill is going to increase their funding by 68 percent. There’s 29 billion dollars in this bill for the National science Foundation.& So don’t you think the American people deserve to know where their money’s being spent.& I don’t want the answer. I believe that 200 million other Americans want to leave some things in life a mystery. I want to know why a man falls in love with a woman or vice versa…. Click here to read more and watch the full video