The Danger Of Cheering On Julian Assange Dana

Author:

Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV

author link

We Condemn Hillary Clinton.

We think it’s criminal and that makes her unfit for the White House because of the behavior she get engaged in this reckless behavior. So do we find it acceptable because Julian Assange is right now leaking out this classified information that has to do with Hillary Clinton because it’s Hillary Clinton yeah that’s a great question and I’m not necessarily sure what the answer is because I think that if it’s out there and it’s in the public square. It’s it’s a public issue right. We can’t just ignore it and say we’re not going to cover this because we don’t like the source right, but I think that I think there’s a difference between saying Look.

This Particular Information Is Out In

the public square and this is what it means and this is what we should think about it and putting Julian Assange. on for an hour or for half an hour and and and again treating him like he’s a hero this week when the very next week when he starts leaking things about Donald Trump we’re all going to think it’s terribly awful because Donald Trump was never in public office and so therefore his information is more private than somebody else’s information even though you know, for instance, with the UK that’s a private organization it’s not a government organization and they had a. They had a legitimate right to keeping their internal communications proprietary I did and as much as we enjoyed their discomfort over this. There is a fundamental fairness issue here, which is that private organizations have the have the right to some sort of privacy that’s not true of governmental operations. It’s only through of governmental operations when we’re dealing with classified information, but Congress has a legitimate oversight.

  • assange
  • exposing
  • hillary
  • privacy
  • whistleblowers

The Courts Have A Legitimate Oversight Over Some

of those things and and to just put it out there. Like this is it’s really wrong it’s it’s it’s theft and what we’re doing is we’re sort of incentivizing more theft in the future? What do you say to those who claim well it’s different because he’s a whistleblower and that this is really this is whistle blowing. It’s not so much an agent at chaos. It’s just whistle blowing it’s not whistle blowing. This is this is not somebody who worked in a government agency who saw wrongdoing and in raised legitimate issues by exposing information that would normally be considered proprietary.

  • whistleblowing julian assange doing whistleblowing
  • reckless behavior acceptable julian assange
  • right leaking classified information hillary
  • acceptable julian assange
  • leaking classified information hillary clinton

Its Not Somebody Who Works Even

in the private industry. The private sector. Somebody who is working for company that. Is perhaps violating the law and needs to it needs to expose information that would normally be covered in a nondisclosure agreement and I would say Jeffrey Wigand from the tobacco industry would be a great example of that there’s that there was a lot of false testimony that was being given to Congress. He had information that that exposed that and that is true whistleblowing what Julian Assange is doing is not whistleblowing.

Hes Aggregating Stolen Materials From People Who Could

have gone to Congress who could have gone to the courts to talk about this instead they stole the materials they handed it off to a third party so that they could so that they didn’t have to have their hands dirty in some of this and and that’s not whistleblowing it’s a different sort of thing. It would be the same thing as saying that a media. that came across the Pentagon Papers, for instance, for another famous case from a few decades back were in the form of whistleblowers that’s not true you.

Summary

Julian Assange leaks classified information that has to do with Hillary Clinton because it’s Hillary Clinton . Julian Assange is right now leaking out this classified information . Hillary Clinton is unfit for the White House because of the behavior she get engaged in this reckless behavior. We condemn Hillary Clinton.& We think it’s criminal and that makes her unfit for a White House. The next week when he starts leaking things about Donald Trump we’re all going to think it’s terribly awful because Donald Trump was never in public office and so therefore his information is more private than somebody else’s information. There is a fundamental fairness issue here, which is that private organizations have the have the right to some sort of privacy that not true of governmental operations. Congress has a legitimate oversight over some of the information, but the courts have a legitimate rights to keep it out there. What do you know, and to just put it out on the public square? What we’re doing is sort of incentivizing more theft in the future?…. Click here to read more and watch the full video