Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV
I Dont See How Youre Going To Have A
check on the the the autocrats in science who work for the federal government when they’re masters that would be the politicians of the same mindset when they’re masters and that would be the media are of the same mindset and so this is the problem. This is the problem. I wrote about in American Marxism. It affects science it affects morality it affects liberty. It affects basics like the ability to make food and distribute food and eat food that is capitalism in the broader sense.
So It Has An Impact On Everything
the scientists have to step in line and follow the follow the routine follow the orders that’s what it’s all about and that will be subsidized. I’ve had experts come on the various platforms and they explain the reason. We have more scientists that push this idea. of of climate change and the sky is falling is because they’re subsidized if you have somebody who says no that’s not the case. They’re a denier.
They Get The Scarlet Letter And Theyre On
their own and you have somebody like Chuck Todd and I’ve Now mentioned this in two books who is not a very bright man quite frankly. He’s not a good journalist because he’s not a journalist. He’s all you know with the Democrat party because his wife is with the Democrat party when he announces on his program a few years back that they will not have anybody on their program who is a climate change denier. There are thousands of scientists meteorologists climatologists all kinds of physicists from top schools practitioners who take a different approach that number one. The earth isn’t warming or if it’s warming it’s because of the sun or if.
Its Warming Theres Not A Damn Thing We
can do about it. You saw Bjorn Lomborg There. He wrote a book and his book talks about yeah. It’s warming a little bit but not really out of emergency. You know or or out of fear that we should be worried about all these things happening because they’re not going to happen and when you think about it as a practical matter they can’t tell you the weather three weeks from now, How do they know what the temperature earth is going to be 50 years from now.
They Dont Have The Foggiest Idea No Idea
whatsoever and the debate on science is more a debate on politics and the debate on politics is more of a a demand of uniformity and conformity than a debate at all so. Ian ran wrote a lot of great books, but she wrote The Return of the primitive which I’ve cited I think in a couple of books but I certainly mentioned on radio as well, and she talks about something that’s very very important this environmental movement. They didn’t call climate change at the time, but she said they’ve changed their tactics in many respects, but in one particular respect. She noted they used to say that capitalism couldn’t provide for the people and now they’ve switched their argument to capitalism is greedy and provides too much for the people of the United States. See the point and climate change as we would call it today or the use of the environment to attack capitalism and to attack the level of living in the United States has become the tool of the left and the intellectuals and of course she was.
Right And So This Whole Thing
about climate change really has not been set for it in a way where the science can support it and so what happens is when you have a debate over these sort of things? Big tech is censoring and silencing individuals who don’t agree with it. Big media is censoring and silencing individuals who don’t agree with it. They character assassinate true experts and scientists who are geniuses brilliant from Princeton and Mit and other places who’ve written about this and talked about it and said wait a minute. This is these these these tests these models are not correct um they have a lot of them cannot get tenure a lot of them lose their jobs. Almost all of them get no federal funding whatsoever you may say well nobody should okay but many do and many of their publications won’t get printed.
And You Know Theyre Not Going To Be
on meet the press or NBc because Chuck Todd announced it but they won’t be on any of these channels, so when I go on radio or here and I say to Chuck Todd. Why not have a debate with these people Since you know so much and since the experts you rely on knows so much why not allow some of these people with Phds and beyond Phds who’ve written extensively on these matters debate it it’s just like the virus issue. How many people have you seen on these Sunday shows that have a different view. You’ll see now and then a guy from Stanford or this one or that one but not on a regular basis not on a regular basis, so we don’t get from our news the kind of information we need it all of it has. been politicized and you notice it’s been politicized in one direction towards more government less freedom more power for those who who bark out these arguments and so forth and the dismissal and and diminution of individuals who take a different position.
I Dont Know Where Wed Be Where
we’d be If the people who do this to us who devout who devour debate and competition of ideas. I don’t know where we’d be if they succeeded 500 years ago, so what Ian Rand called this as these are the primitives because what she said was if you are not free to discuss these issues. If you are not free to have a conflict to have a debate. If you are not free to have competing scientific ideas legitimately.
- debate free competing scientific ideas
- going check autocrats science work
- debate science debate politics
- marxism affects science affects morality
- wrote american marxism affects science
Then This Is An Attack On What On
what your brain because what they’re saying is you may think something but. Keep your mouth shut you can’t test it You can’t promote it. You can’t even institute it keep your mouth shut so it’s an effort to stupefy people to dumb down people and to make them compliant for more sign up for Levin Tv.
I don’t see how you’re going to have a check on the the autocrats in science who work for the federal government when they’re masters . The scientists have to step in line and follow the follow the routine follow the orders that’s what it’s all about and that will be subsidized. If you have somebody who says no that’s not the case.& They’re a denier. They get the scarlet letter and they’re on their own and you have someone like Chuck Todd and I’ve Now mentioned this in two books who is not a very bright man quite frankly. He’s not a good journalist because he’s . He’s all you know with the Democrat party because his wife is with the . Democrat party when he announced on his program a few years back that they will not have anybody on their program a year ago that they won’t have anybody on their . program who is a climate change denier . The earth isn’t warming or if it’s warming it’s because of the sun…. Click here to read more and watch the full video