Video Creator’s Channel BlazeTV
- subsidies
- taxpayer
- obamacare
- taxation
- insurance
So Mayor Petes Plant Is Really No Different Than
any of the other plans, all he’s doing in his own words, is putting an extra step in place until the government can force us into single-payer plus once there’s an offer of those subsidies Yeah people are going to want it now. The government is separated into two different sides. One side collects the revenue and the other side spends it when the government takes over the duty to provide a service. The relationship between how much an individual pays for a service and what the individual receives in the form of services is broken given the fact that the government doesn’t collect any revenue from a substantial portion of the population, but fully Gretz services to that portion of the population, meaning people are getting something for nothing. It’s impossible for a taxpayer to get $1 worth of services.
A Dollars Worth Of Taxation When
the government is providing the service now 10 years ago. Democrats like representative Jan Schakowsky, who personally helped launch Obama’s presidential bid told us their intent in plain languageNK] UK public health insurance option. Don’t disagree with the goal. This is not a principled fight. This is a fight about strategy for getting there and I believe I see that that little step in the middle right the goal is to get to single-payer so let’s start with how the government is going to pay for any one of these left-wing health care takeovers spoiler alert you’re gonna pay for it but who remembers Jonathan Gruber he was the Obamacare architect.
He Designed The Funding Model And Here He
is describing it in detail. This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure UK did not score the mandate his taxes. ##NK] score the man his taxes to build dies okay, so it’s written to do that in terms of in terms of risk rating subsidies. If you had a law which said healthy people are gonna pay in we’ve made explicit the health people pay and sick people get money it would not have passed okay just like the cow people transparent. Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage and basically you know called the stupid the American voter or whatever but basically that was really really critical to get him to think to pass and you know it’s the second best argument look I wish mark was right.
We Can Make It All Transparent But Id
rather have this law than not so there was from day one a new tax and a huge lie about it. Oh and you’re stupid. So first the government is going to. collect tax dollars from you now the other side of the government is going to determine the spending. Gruber was the architect of the intake model but Dr.
Ezekiel Emanuel, Brother Of Then Obama, Chief Of
staff Rahm. Emanuel remember him. He was also the mayor of Chicago was the architect of the distribution model. Let me introduce you to two concepts buried in these plans quality adjusted life years and disability adjusted life years. Both of these concepts are the basis of what the government will pay to treat you in short what value to the system as a whole are you now now follow on January 31st 2009.
Doctor You Will Issued An Academic
paper to the land set the Health Journal of the UK entitled Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions Now I have to do this I’m going to tread on your attention span here. But stick with me so here we go speaking on what he calls the complete lives system. Emmanuel lays out how the progressive health care system will work quote consideration of the importance of complete lives also supports modifying the youngest first principle by prioritizing adolescents and young adults over infants. Adolescents have received substantial education and parental care investments that will be wasted without a complete life infants by contrast have not yet received these investments. Similarly, adolescence brings with it a developed personality capable of forming and valuing long-term plans whose fulfillment requires a complete life that’s how quality adjusted life years worse so to hell with the babies they aren’t worth anything I mean that is, unless of course they have an important last name or more attached to government well.
Then Comes This Quote When Implemented
the complete lives system produces a priority curve on. which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years, get the most substantial chance Where is the youngest and oldest people get chances that art in Ewing if therefore superficially resembles the proposal made by disability adjusted life years advocates. However, the complete life system justifies preference to younger people because of priority to the worst off rather than instrumental value. Additionally, the complete lives system assumes that although life years are equally valuable to all justice requires the fair distribution of them. Conversely, da ly allocation creeps life years given to elderly or disabled people as objectively less valuable so I guess the hell with you after 40 as well.
See What Youre Seeing Is The
system is being reconfigured to simply put people back to work to support the State and the system itself, but of course, there has to be an escape hatch for people who are how you say more equal than others quote. Unlike the previous values. Social value cannot direct allocation on its own rather social value. Allocation prioritizes specific individuals to enable them to promote other important values or rewards them for having promoted these values unquote so who are those specific individuals hi yes the people in government do you think the elites are gonna wait on line with you. So here’s the argument the left in this country isn’t trying to improve healthcare and let’s be honest.
They Cant To Do That Theyd Have To
get the government out of the way and that’s not gonna happen. This country has over 350 million people and no one-size-fits-all program could ever work but the Democrats want us to be more like the UK why for those great cancer survival stats note they are dead last in the industrialized world, but you didn’t hear that from me. There is no you wide Healthcare System and when they claim the free market has failed and insurers are evil. They leave at how much the insurers are actually regulated and thus protected against competition. We’ve never actually seen the free market at work in health care.
- subsidies yeah people going want
- services dollars worth taxation government
- subsidies law said healthy
- uk public health insurance option
- meaning people getting impossible taxpayer
Theyre Just Trying To Control It And
by virtue control you with the addition of a quality. system American citizens would find themselves evermore denied life-extending treatments as the system would evermore favor newly arrived immigrants and even illegals why because you’re going to be treated based on the returns to government, not necessarily your personal needs remember all of the 2020 Dems want to provide health care to illegal aliens and the system as the Democrats wanted would first decouple your relationship as a payer into the system versus what you get out of it next it would eliminate the premium of citizenship and then it would treat you as a nameless faceless number on a spreadsheet and not a paying customer. Then finally, in the end there’ll be nowhere else for you to go. How long will it take to get treated the line forms to the left.
Summary
Mayor Pete’s plant is no different than any of the other plans, all he’s doing in his own words, is putting an extra step in place until the government can force us into single-payer plus once there’s an offer of those subsidies Yeah people are going to want it now.& The relationship between how much an individual pays for a service and what the individual receives in the form of services is broken given the fact that the government doesn’t collect any revenue from a substantial portion of the population, meaning people are getting something for nothing. The government is separated into two different sides.& One side collects the revenue and the other side spends it when the government takes over the duty to provide a service. It’s impossible for a taxpayer to get $1 worth of services. The bill was written in a tortured way to make sure UK did not score the man his taxes to build dies okay, so it’s written to do that in terms of risk rating subsidies.& It’s written…. Click here to read more and watch the full video